Get what you deserve, Race to Win. Is it always true?

by MainUser 19. October 2016 11:18

I have a great question for you Have you got everything you deserver? , I am sure 90% people will say no. Most of us once in our lives must have not got what we deserved and the only thought that crosses our minds would be ‘so what! Leonardo have also not won the Oscar despite being a brilliant actor’. This statement was such a relief for all those unfortunate lot who work hard but never got recognized for it. Leonardo was an ideal for all these people, however, now people can’t relate them to him anymore, because he is among the proud winners of Oscar. A well-deserved victory for him. With four Oscar nominations to his name, which is no less an accomplishment and winning now the golden man, this journey for Leonardo has been a long wait for the laurel. There were several memes dedicated to him for his unsuccessfulness to bag an Oscar. He made an impact on the minds of people but failed every time to make an impression on the minds of the jury, which was a much talked about topic all over the world. His atypical and versatile performances in many more were winning the hearts but not Oscars for him. Finally after when he won this prestigious award there are people who think that the reason he won the award for ‘The Revenant’ is not because he performed outstandingly but because he was due for Oscars. His better performances were not awarded and a mediocre performance as in The Revenant bagged him that much awaited prize for this skills.

Somehow this adage appears so true ‘Awards are not always for the deserved’. The institution of awards and the people at jury fail to recognize the real talent so many times. Mostly, they are influenced by some wrong perceptions or their own opinions to hail a nominee as a winner. Leonardo is one such classic case of Oscar winners/losers, where in, the jury never acknowledged him for his out of the box lethal performances and they seem to get impressed by a mediocre performance which he had done, leading to a questionable state about the authenticity of such awards. Somehow the campaigning, PR etc. also play a deterrent role in someone’s win, it’s not just the quality of work that matters to the jury.

This year probably there was not much of a competition for Leonardo and he earned appreciation both critically and commercially making it big for himself from all directions. Oscars are awarded to veterans and established actors, as the history says people with an established fame get Oscars not the lesser known actors, in that view Leonardo is a name that is revered not only in Hollywood but across the globe. Leonardo would have won this award already for his film ‘What’s Eating Gilbert Grape’ when he was just 20 years old. This year Leonardo had been the only actor that fulfilled every awkward criterion to be an Oscar winner and finally this indefinable trophy got a place in his shelf. Fans are happy for him, however they kind of opinionate that this win could have come to him much before for this exceptional versatility as an actor in many more from his bandwagon. He turned indisputably inimitable plots into commercial successes but his worth got recognized through a movie in which he delivered a good performance which was far lesser than his other stalwart portrayals.

This year Leonardo did not leave any room for improvement while campaigning for The Reverent. Be it telling the world about the frozen cold of the shooting locations of The Reverent or be it telling them that they survived by eating the bison’s liver which made him sick. He made every impression telling people how much he strived to get into the character. He successfully made a mark! It became a proved notion that talent does not play a hundred percent role in one’s success, it is the advertising and branding of oneself that makes someone more acceptable by people. Masses react to aura , they go to watch their stars for substance , however they form an image behind their mind before they go for a movie or anything spectacular that captures their attention do play a substantial role in making a movie and it’s stars a hit.

awards awlays does not mean that you had great race!!

Tags: , , ,

Cinema | Entertainment | Expert's View | News

Entertainment for Children, Are we doing enough?

by iExpert 11. July 2016 09:44

The children of 21st century are not generation X they are now generation Z or may be generation Y. They are a step ahead of generation X kids who somehow did not live into the world of internet completely but lived in the real world too. However the generations to come will witness everything at the click of their smartphone and every feeling in the form of virtual reality. Internet is the ocean of information from all around the world, but the challenge is how to search relevant content for children. It is like they are sunk into this ocean and there is no respite from it as Google is the answer for all the questions under the sun. As a result Google exposes the kids to numerous other content which are not meant for them. Entertainment industry especially outside US too does not offer a wholesome relevant entertaining package to children due to lack of audience in this segment. The animation and action both the forms lack a quality for children and they are largely dependent on foreign channels and movies for their entertainment needs. They like Avengers, Pokemon, Superman and many such animated and action heroes.

In India children have a scarceness of the animated films. Some shows being a class apart from its counterparts and most adored by Indian or other kids is the only such movie of our times which has changed the definition of kids’ entertainment. The monetary investment are high and returns are marginally lower. The producers and directors like to make commercially successful projects whereas the children want something of high quality visual and audio, they are exposed to the world of PS and internet and they like some really good high dimensional experience. The kids know exactly to maneuver most of the devices like smartphones, iPad, play stations and they are into high grade entertainment and amidst this if they are given a ham-fisted piece of art or animation they will not lap it and will slowly move to the world of virtual reality which is through gaming consoles which give them more liberty and enthusiasm. We lack the type of entertainment which Minions or Ice Age or Harry Potter yields to the children and it is because in Bollywood children’s film are not a category. Some movies hit the theatre once in years, and filmmakers are not at all motivated to make such films which cater to the children’s psyche. Children’s films may not give them enough profits which they sure to get when they launch a superstar in their movie. However the dearth is of engaging content for children, which could make them relate to their lives and things around them. Children have productive minds. Their inquisitiveness proportion is much higher than that of adults. They want to discover, know further, and unleash their fancy. Stories, songs and visuals partially fulfill this curiosity and leave them to want for more. 

 

Films help shape children’s artistic receptivity, polish their quizzical skill, and finely help to baseline their value systems. India is the largest producer of feature films in the world (over 1000 films a year), the number of children’s films it produces annually is appallingly low – just about a handful or so per year which is not an encouraging number. Though India does not have a scarcity of stories, there is a dearth of good screenplay writers and directors for sure who could render the stories into entertaining films. On commercial grounds the producers do not plunge into children’s meaningful cinema as they believe in the fact that there is a little take away for everyone in their mainstream films. The film fraternity should step up for the making of films meant for children and display a different sensibility in terms of art which can provide the needs of children entertainment and they should not resort to the unlimited and uncensored content on the Internet and indulge themselves in the films which are made for them, making them responsible as well prevent their mind to wander in the unbounded source of content available on internet.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Entertainment | Media | Television

Entertainment Race in the box, who’s gonna win?

by iExpert 12. June 2016 12:11

You must have surprised with the title "Entertainment Race in the box, who’s gonna win?" what is the race in the box for entertainment , but if you have switch from one to other tv boxes then you must have got an idea that what is I am talking about.

Yes I am talking about the race of TV boxes by many companies out there, currently we have so many different kind of TV streaming box in market and it is just to complicate to choose for the normal non-technical user who has very limited knowledge about apps, resolution and connectivity option they provide and also the limitation of each box, which they realized after buying them. Each and every box has their own pros and cons but we are not going to talk about those there because you can easily go and check their spec side by side on net and find out difference if you get it, Here I am trying put the point is, why these TV boxes has limitation one over other when the technology is available for every company and they know about it. For an instance Roku, Apple Tv and Amazon fire sticks are head to head competition in this category.

Each one has their up’s and down some are good some are bad but every time they comes up new version and old version is just stalls, I can get that they don’t want to release everything at same time and stop their sell on that device instead they release it step by step and keep upgrading version also the software inside this. In my personal experience I had use both the box Roku and Apple Tv.

For just an example let consider Roku, the casting feature is really poor in that, I don’t have any idea that if Apple TV can make real progress in casting functionality then why cannot Roku go and work on casting feature and make their device good. On other hand Apple TV has good casting capabilities but when it comes to app they just way behind and has very limited apps and it just bound you and you start hating.

Sometime I feel that when these companies are working against each other they just have some kind of mutual agreement that they will have monopoly in certain feature so that they could survive in the market side by side, one simple thing is Remote , now why can they just come to an agreement and design some kind of remote which has simpler structure , I don’t want to limit the innovation and ability of devices but come on when it comes to kids and non-technical people who has very limited grasp over the remote and when you handle them apple tv remote they just hate it , why you want to replace the button with touch pad , I get it if someone want it that way they have an option , make to remotes one simple and one super complicated, this is my personal experience my 5 year daughter just struggle with apple tv remote and hate it whereas the remote on Roku was really good for handling , one more is thickness , I know apple is famous for their stick design but , when someone has their remote always sticking inside middle of couch or just goes below rug while dusting then you started thinking that why the hell they made this thing so small , every time I try to find it and it’s a job one of kind. 

I am not against the innovation they put in each product and comes up with unique and good ideas but when someone think about these just not only focus of tech oriented folk rather than consider from three year kids to 70 year old how they are going to use this.

On closing node I must say no body gonna win this race of box because each one has important one or another feature and it will always be a personal choice rather than what they offer.

Tags: , , , ,

Entertainment | Expert's View | Reviews | Television